The High Court has ruled that two directors breached their legal duties when they used company property to fund their pensions.

The case involved a company that had been incorporated in 1998 to take over a volunteer-run project that renovated and resold donated furniture.

In 2001 the company bought a property as its premises. Some of its profits came from renting out meeting rooms in the property.

In 2009 the two directors, the only ones remaining in the company, received financial advice from accountants indicating that their salaries were small compared to similar positions elsewhere.

They then arranged self-invested personal pensions (SIPPs) for themselves, funded in part by a transfer of the freehold of the property to a SIPP provider.

The company was to continue to occupy the property for £60,000 rent per annum; the lease prevented the sub-letting of meeting rooms.

The directors agreed that there could be repercussions of public disclosure of the pension arrangements, including within the company, and sought to disclose the arrangements with bland wording. They subsequently left the company.

The company brought proceedings to hold the directors liable for its loss of the property, alleging that the transfer amounted to a breach of their duties.

The High Court found in its favour.

It noted that before the transfer, the company had been making modest profits and the property was its main asset; after the transfer it lost that asset, became liable for rent and could not sub-let.

In establishing the pension schemes, the directors did not act in the company’s interest. Exposing it to rent requirements without being able to hire out rooms amounted to a failure to promote the company’s success.

They failed to exercise due diligence and put themselves into conflict with the company. They were in breach of their fiduciary duties.

Please contact us if you would like more information about the issues raised in this article or any aspect of company law.

Ceredigion Recycling and Furniture Team v Pope
Judgment Date
30 June 2021
[2021] EWHC 1783 (Ch)
Judge Jarman QC

Disclaimer: General Information Provided Only.

Please note that the contents of this article are intended solely for general information purposes and should not be considered as legal advice.

    Request a callback

    One of our highly experienced team will be in touch with you shortly.